Not all Light is the same.
- Sinead Spearing

- 2 days ago
- 3 min read
True life IS love. And yet, not everything that appears as love is true.
We do not war against flesh and blood. The struggle is not with people, but with what moves through them—what distorts, imitates, and feeds on what is real.

A curse is formed through intent. It fixes itself like a programme, drawing energy from those it attaches to, sustaining itself through fear, attention, and belief. Prayer, too, is intent—but of an entirely different order. True prayer is not control, nor the projection of personal will. It is not the shaping of outcomes, nor the manipulation of unseen forces. True prayer is surrender. It is the opening of the human heart to God, that His will—not ours—may move through us.
In this way, prayer becomes a living conduit through which love enters the world.
This is why true prayer carries such quiet power. It does not strain. It aligns.
But what, then, of suffering?
What of the widespread belief—often reported in near-death experiences—that we come here to learn through pain? That souls choose lives of grief, betrayal, even abuse in order to grow?
At first glance, this offers meaning. It suggests order. It redeems suffering by giving it purpose. But it also says something profound and troubling: that evil, in some way, is necessary. That pain is ultimately good.
This cannot be reconciled with a God who is love.
God does not evolve. He does not require experience in order to know. He does not design suffering as a curriculum, nor assign roles of victim and perpetrator for the sake of spiritual development. And yet, those who report such experiences are not lying. Their conviction is real and well founded.
There is, instead, a deeper error—one of interpretation.
The spiritual realm is not uniform. It contains both truth and distortion. It is entirely possible to encounter something real, something beautiful, something filled with a sense of belonging—and yet misunderstand its nature.
Not all light is the same.
There are realms of connection, familiarity, even what feels like shared purpose. But from this, it does not follow that souls contract suffering, or that evil is part of a divine learning system.
That leap is where deception enters.

Evil does not create. It imitates.
It borrows the language of love, the feeling of beauty, the structure of meaning—and bends them just enough to hold attention, to sustain belief, to keep the soul engaged.
This world, then, is not wholly false—but neither is it whole. There is real goodness here. Real beauty. Real moments of love. But they are partial, fragile, and often entangled with distortion. They are glimpses, not the fullness. Seeds, not the Kingdom itself. To recognise this is not to reject the world, but to see it clearly. Jesus did not teach withdrawal into illusion, nor immersion in it. He taught freedom from it—to live within the world without becoming bound by it. To give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to refuse participation in cycles that feed on harm. To turn the other cheek, not as passivity, but as a refusal to sustain the pattern.
We are not freed from deception simply by dying. Awareness does not arrive automatically or in full. Just as in life, the soul must still discern, must still see clearly, must still awaken.
True freedom, then, is not escape through death, nor evolution through suffering—but alignment with what is real. And what is real is this:
God is love.
Not a distant ideal, not a force to be harnessed, but a living reality that does not depend on this world and is not sustained by it. We do not generate this love. We cannot manufacture it.
But we can align with it.We can open to it.We can allow it to move through us—quietly, steadily—without distortion.
And in doing so, even here, something true enters.




Comments